Creamer
Nestlé Coffee mate Italian Sweet Creme
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains added sugars
- Contains emulsifiers studied for gut effects
- Contains seed oils
- Contains artificial flavors
Why it scores 31
Nestlé Coffee mate Italian Sweet Creme scores 31 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Cellulose gum (carboxymethylcellulose): In a small randomized feeding trial, carboxymethylcellulose modestly increased abdominal discomfort and reduced gut microbiota diversity; in mice it promoted low-grade inflammation. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better coffee creamers and half and half
-
Superfood Creamer Sweet & Creamy Laird Superfood · 16 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 75 out of 100 , 44 points higher -
Sweet + Creamy with Functional Mushrooms Laird Superfood Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 69 out of 100 , 38 points higher -
Half and Half Ultra-Pasteurized Horizon Organic · 32 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 69 points higher -
Half And Half Creamer Land O Lake · 30 mL Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 69 points higher -
Grassfed Half & Half Organic Valley · 16 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 69 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Italian Sweet Creme
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Cellulose gum (carboxymethylcellulose) minus 7.5 points
- Carrageenan minus 7.5 points
- Sucralose minus 4 points
- Vegetable oil (unspecified) minus 1.5 points
- Milk protein concentrate / isolate minus 1.5 points
- Potassium phosphate minus 0.5 points
- Natural and artificial flavors minus 0.5 points
- Microcrystalline cellulose minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 5 g / 100 g minus 3 points
100 − 69 = 31
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 35 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 5 g |
| Sugars | 5 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g |
Serving: 1 Tbsp (15 ml)
Ingredients
- Water
- Sugar (high concern)
- Vegetable Oil ( High Oleic Soybean and / or High Oleic Canola)
- Micellar Casein (a Milk Derivative) ( Not a Source of Lactose)
- Mono- and Digylcerides (not recognized)
- Dipotassium Phosphate
- Natural and Artificial Flavor
- Salt
- Cellulose Gel
- Cellulose Gum (moderate concern)
- Carrageenan (moderate concern)
- Sucralose (moderate concern)
Label text, as published
Water, Sugar, Vegetable Oil ( High Oleic Soybean and / or High Oleic Canola), and Less than 2% of Micellar Casein (a Milk Derivative) ( Not a Source of Lactose), Mono- and Digylcerides, Dipotassium Phosphate, Natural and Artificial Flavor, Salt, Cellulose Gel, Cellulose Gum, Carrageenan, Sucralose. Contains: Milk.
Allergens and diets
Contains: Milk, Soy
- Not vegan
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“Relative to control subjects, CMC consumption modestly increased postprandial abdominal discomfort and perturbed gut microbiota composition in a way that reduced its diversity.”
doi.org
-
Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome
“carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80, induced low-grade inflammation and obesity/metabolic syndrome in wild-type hosts and promoted robust colitis in mice predisposed to this disorder.”
doi.org
-
“This study found positive associations between risk of CVD and intake of five individual and two groups of food additive emulsifiers widely used in industrial foods.”
doi.org
-
“The Panel concluded that there was no need for a numerical ADI and that there would be no safety concern at the reported uses and use levels for the unmodified and modified celluloses”
doi.org
-
“We found direct associations between the risk of type 2 diabetes and exposures to various food additive emulsifiers widely used in industrial foods, in a large prospective cohort of French adults.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of carrageenan (E 407) and processed Eucheuma seaweed (E 407a) as food additives
“However, the Panel noted uncertainties as regards the chemistry, the exposure assessment and biological and toxicological data.”
doi.org
-
Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–142 (List of Classifications)
monographs.iarc.who.int
-
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance
“As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”
doi.org
-
“Sucralose-6-acetate significantly increased the expression of genes associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer”
doi.org
-
“EFSA’s experts concluded that the sweetener sucralose (E 955) continues to be safe for consumers for its currently authorised uses as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
“replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes.”
doi.org
-
“These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.”
doi.org
-
EFSA issues new advice on phosphates
“We estimated that dietary exposure to phosphates may exceed the new ADI for infants, toddlers and children with average consumption of phosphates in their diet.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org