Energy drinks
Alani Energy Drink Witch's Brew
12 fl oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains caffeine
- No synthetic dyes
Why it scores 36
Alani Energy Drink Witch's Brew scores 36 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Caramel color: The FDA says classes III and IV, which can contain 4-MEI, are the most commonly used food color additives by volume. Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Sucralose: In a 2022 randomized study, sucralose and saccharin altered the gut microbiome and impaired glucose responses in some people; a 2023 lab study raised questions about its by-product sucralose-6-acetate. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better energy drinks
-
Orange Kiss Energy Drink Alani Nu · 12 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 97 out of 100 , 61 points higher -
RETRO Vibe Sparkling Sherbet Soda Celsius · 12 fl oz No non-nutritive sweeteners · No caramel color Score 76 out of 100 , 40 points higher -
Kiwi strawberry Celsius · 12 fl oz No non-nutritive sweeteners · No caramel color Score 79 out of 100 , 43 points higher -
JOCKO GO Real Energy Orange flavor Jocko No caffeine · No caramel color Score 75 out of 100 , 39 points higher -
White Peach Zero Sugar Energy Drink ZOA · 12 fl oz No non-nutritive sweeteners · No caramel color Score 75 out of 100 , 39 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Alani Energy Drink Witch's Brew
Ingredients
- Caramel color minus 20 points
- Sucralose minus 7.5 points
- Sodium benzoate minus 7.5 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 4 points
- Caffeine minus 1.5 points
- Potassium sorbate minus 1.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
Nutrition per 100 ml
- Energy 4 kcal / 100 ml minus 1 points
100 − 64.5 = 35.5 → 36
Can’t score above 79. Contains caramel color, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4]
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Energy | 4 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g |
Serving: 1 serving (355 ml)
Ingredients
- Carbonated Water
- Citric Acid
- Taurine
- Sodium Citrate
- Caffeine
- Sucralose (moderate concern)
- Caramel Color (high concern)
- Sodium Benzoate (Preservative) (moderate concern)
- Potassium Sorbate (Preservative)
- L-Carnitine L-Tartrate
- L-Theanine
- Acesulfame Potassium (moderate concern)
- Panax Ginseng Root Extract
- Natural Flavor
- Niacinamide (Vitamin B3)
- Inositol
- Glucuronolactone
- Salt
- Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin Bs)
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6)
- Guarana Seed Extract
- 0-Biotin
- Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12)
Label text, as published
Carbonated Water, Citric Acid, Taurine, Sodium Citrate, Caffeine, Sucralose, Caramel Color, Sodium Benzoate (Preservative), Potassium Sorbate (Preservative), L-Carnitine L-Tartrate, L-Theanine, Acesulfame Potassium, Panax Ginseng Root Extract, Natural Flavor, Niacinamide (Vitamin B3), Inositol, Glucuronolactone, Salt, Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin Bs), Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6), Guarana Seed Extract, 0-Biotin, Cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12).
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Questions & Answers About 4-MEI
“Based on current science, the FDA has no reason to believe that there are any immediate or short-term health risks presented by 4-MEI at the levels expected in food.”
fda.gov
-
Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–142 (List of Classifications)
monographs.iarc.who.int
-
Proposition 65 List of Chemicals Known to the State to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity
“The date refers to the initial appearance of the chemical on the list.”
oehha.ca.gov
-
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance
“As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”
doi.org
-
“Sucralose-6-acetate significantly increased the expression of genes associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer”
doi.org
-
“EFSA’s experts concluded that the sweetener sucralose (E 955) continues to be safe for consumers for its currently authorised uses as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
“Artificial colours or a sodium benzoate preservative (or both) in the diet result in increased hyperactivity in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the general population.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of benzyl alcohol (E 1519) as food additive (records the 2016 benzoate re-evaluation)
“derived a group ADI of 5 mg/kg bw per day (expressed as benzoic acid) in accordance with the ADI previously derived by SCF and JECFA”
doi.org
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much?
“For most adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams* a day — that's about two to three 12-fluid-ounce cups of coffee — as an amount not generally associated with negative effects.”
fda.gov
-
Caffeine (EFSA topic page; Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine, 2015)
“Caffeine intakes from all sources up to 200mg per day consumed throughout the day do not raise safety concerns for the foetus.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
21 CFR 182.3640 Potassium sorbate
ecfr.gov
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 4.1 (beverages with high caffeine content)
“‘High caffeine content. Not recommended for children or pregnant or breast-feeding women’”
eur-lex.europa.eu