Ice creams
Talenti Mediterranean Mint
1 pint
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in sugar
- High in saturated fat
- Contains added sugars
- Seed-oil free
Why it scores 11
Talenti Mediterranean Mint scores 11 out of 100 (Bad) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 20 points Dextrose: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better ice cream
-
MINT CHIP ice cream Rebel · 1 pint Less sugar · No added sugars Score 48 out of 100 , 37 points higher -
Mint Chocolate Chip Flavor N!ck's · 1 pint/473 mL Less sugar · Less saturated fat Score 55 out of 100 , 44 points higher -
Mint Chocolate Chip Avocado Frozen Dessert Cado · 1 PT/473 mL Less sugar · Less saturated fat Score 42 out of 100 , 31 points higher -
Mint To Bee Ice Cream For Bears Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 43 out of 100 , 32 points higher -
Coconut Milk Non Dairy Frozen Dessert No Sugar Added Mint Chip Pint So Delicious Dairy Free · 16 oz Less sugar · No added sugars Score 41 out of 100 , 30 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Mediterranean Mint
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Dextrose minus 20 points
- Sunflower lecithin minus 2.5 points
- Locust bean gum minus 1.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 1.5 points
- Guar gum minus 1.5 points
- Soy lecithin minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 24 g / 100 g minus 11 points
- Saturated fat 7 g / 100 g minus 7 points
- Energy 226 kcal / 100 g minus 1 points
100 − 89 = 11
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in saturated fat and sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [7]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 226 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 10.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 25 g |
| Sugars | 24 g |
| Added sugars | 21.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g |
Serving: 1 serving (133 g)
Ingredients
- Milk
- sugar (high concern)
- cream
- chocolate
- dextrose (high concern)
- milk fat
- cocoa butter
- sunflower lecithin
- carob bean gum
- natural flavor
- guar gum
- chocolate (processed with alkali)
- vanilla extract
- soy lecithin
- mint leaf extractives
Label text, as published
Milk, sugar, cream, chocolate, dextrose, milk fat, cocoa butter, sunflower lecithin, carob bean gum, natural flavor, guar gum, chocolate (processed with alkali), vanilla extract, soy lecithin, mint leaf extractives.
Allergens and diets
Contains: Milk, Soy
- Not vegan
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline
“WHO recommends that adults and children reduce saturated fatty acid intake to 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).”
who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org