Simple syrups
Great Value Sugar Free Syrup
2 tbs
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains sugar alcohols
- Contains emulsifiers studied for gut effects
- Contains artificial flavors
- No synthetic dyes
Why it scores 30
Great Value Sugar Free Syrup scores 30 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Caramel color: The FDA says classes III and IV, which can contain 4-MEI, are the most commonly used food color additives by volume. Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Cellulose gum (carboxymethylcellulose): In a small randomized feeding trial, carboxymethylcellulose modestly increased abdominal discomfort and reduced gut microbiota diversity; in mice it promoted low-grade inflammation. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better pancake and maple syrup
-
Zero Sugar Maple Syrup Wholesome Yum · 12 fl oz/354 mL No sugar alcohols · No gut-studied emulsifiers Score 69 out of 100 , 39 points higher -
Sugar Cane Syrup Keep It Simple Syrup · 375 mL/12.7 fl oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 65 out of 100 , 35 points higher -
Fruit Mix in Extra Light Syrup Mission Pride · 425 g Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 75 out of 100 , 45 points higher -
Gourmet classic sugar free syrup Davinci · 25.4 fl oz/750 mL No sugar alcohols · No caramel color Score 55 out of 100 , 25 points higher -
Cane sugar syrup Tate & Lyle Sugars · 16 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 61 out of 100 , 31 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Sugar Free Syrup
Ingredients
- Caramel color minus 20 points
- Cellulose gum (carboxymethylcellulose) minus 7.5 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Sucralose minus 4 points
- Sorbitol minus 1.5 points
- Natural and artificial flavors minus 1.5 points
- Xanthan gum minus 0.5 points
- Sorbic acid minus 0.5 points
- Sodium hexametaphosphate minus 0.5 points
- Phosphoric acid minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 6 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 7.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Salt 0.5 g / 100 g minus 1 points
100 − 70.5 = 29.5 → 30
Can’t score above 79. Contains caramel color, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 58 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 18.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g |
Serving: 2 Tbsp (30 ml)
Ingredients
- WATER
- SORBITOL
- CELLULOSE GUM (moderate concern)
- SALT
- NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS
- CARAMEL COLOR (high concern)
- XANTHAN GUM
- SORBIC ACID AND SODIUM BENZOATE (PRESERVATIVES)
- ACESULFAME POTASSIUM (NON NUTRITIVE SWEETENER) (moderate concern)
- POTASSIUM CHLORIDE
- SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE
- PHOSPHORIC ACID
- SUCRALOSE (NON NUTRITIVE SWEETENER) (moderate concern)
Label text, as published
WATER, SORBITOL*, CONTAINS LESS THAN 2% OF CELLULOSE GUM, SALT, NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS, CARAMEL COLOR, XANTHAN GUM, SORBIC ACID AND SODIUM BENZOATE (PRESERVATIVES), ACESULFAME POTASSIUM (NON NUTRITIVE SWEETENER)*, POTASSIUM CHLORIDE*, SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE, PHOSPHORIC ACID, SUCRALOSE (NON NUTRITIVE SWEETENER)*.
Allergens and diets
May contain: Milk, Soy, Gluten, Egg
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Questions & Answers About 4-MEI
“Based on current science, the FDA has no reason to believe that there are any immediate or short-term health risks presented by 4-MEI at the levels expected in food.”
fda.gov
-
Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–142 (List of Classifications)
monographs.iarc.who.int
-
Proposition 65 List of Chemicals Known to the State to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity
“The date refers to the initial appearance of the chemical on the list.”
oehha.ca.gov
-
“Relative to control subjects, CMC consumption modestly increased postprandial abdominal discomfort and perturbed gut microbiota composition in a way that reduced its diversity.”
doi.org
-
Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome
“carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80, induced low-grade inflammation and obesity/metabolic syndrome in wild-type hosts and promoted robust colitis in mice predisposed to this disorder.”
doi.org
-
“This study found positive associations between risk of CVD and intake of five individual and two groups of food additive emulsifiers widely used in industrial foods.”
doi.org
-
“The Panel concluded that there was no need for a numerical ADI and that there would be no safety concern at the reported uses and use levels for the unmodified and modified celluloses”
doi.org
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance
“As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”
doi.org
-
“Sucralose-6-acetate significantly increased the expression of genes associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer”
doi.org
-
“EFSA’s experts concluded that the sweetener sucralose (E 955) continues to be safe for consumers for its currently authorised uses as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.4 (foods with more than 10 % added polyols)
“‘excessive consumption may produce laxative effects’.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
EFSA issues new advice on phosphates
“We estimated that dietary exposure to phosphates may exceed the new ADI for infants, toddlers and children with average consumption of phosphates in their diet.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org