Smash Foods Jam-Packed Bites
Photo: Open Food Facts contributors (CC BY-SA)

Dried fruit and seed mixes

Smash Foods Jam-Packed Bites

50 g

Score

Good 61 out of 100 High confidence
  • Ultra-processed
  • High in sugar
  • Contains whole grains

Why it scores 61

Smash Foods Jam-Packed Bites scores 61 out of 100 (Good) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:

  1. minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
  2. minus 14 points Sugars 36 g / 100 g: Very high in sugar. Strong
  3. plus 4 points Fiber 8 g / 100 g: A good source of fiber. Strong

Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.

The Receipt

Jam-Packed Bites

START100

Ingredients

  • Rice protein minus 2.5 points
    Info An ingredient typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [1]
  • Pectin minus 2.5 points
    Info An ingredient class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [1]
subtotal−5

Processing

  • Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
    Strong Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. [1]
  • 2 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 1.5 points
    Emerging Industrial additive classes found: industrial protein and thickener, stabilizer or gelling agent. [1]
subtotal−19.5

Nutrition per 100 g

  • Sugars 36 g / 100 g minus 14 points
    Strong Very high in sugar. [2]
  • Salt 0.9 g / 100 g minus 3 points
    Strong High in salt. [3]
  • Energy 440 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
    Info Energy-dense for its weight. [4]
  • Fiber 8 g / 100 g plus 4 points
    Strong A good source of fiber. [4]
subtotal−15

TOTAL 61Good

100 − 39.5 = 60.5 → 61

Can’t score above 79. High in sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [5]


GTIN 00850055550261 · 2026-10-08

score v1.3.0 · kb 2026.10.11

High confidence

Same product, same score. Every time.

Nutrition per 100 g

Energy440 kcal
Fat16 g
Saturated fat1 g
Carbohydrates54 g
Sugars36 g
Added sugars4 g
Fiber8 g
Protein16 g
Salt0.9 g

Serving: 5 bites (50 g)

Ingredients

High Moderate Not recognized Tap an ingredient for its evidence and rules.
Label text, as published

DATES, SUNFLOWER BUTTER, BROWN RICE PROTEIN, OAT FLOUR, STRAWBERRY JUICE CONCENTRATE, CHIA SEEDS, SEA SALT, VANILLA POWDER, FRUIT PECTIN

Allergens and diets

Contains: Gluten

  • Vegan
  • Vegetarian
  • Not gluten-free
  • Palm-oil-free

Always check the package: recipes change.

Sources

  1. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them

    Public Health Nutrition · April 2019 · Peer-reviewed

    doi.org

  2. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children

    World Health Organization · Mar 4, 2015 · Agency assessment

    “In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”

    who.int

  3. Sodium reduction (fact sheet)

    World Health Organization · May 11, 2026 · Agency assessment

    “For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”

    who.int

  4. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture · January 2026 · Regulator

    “Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”

    cdn.realfood.gov

  5. Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets

    Department of Health and Social Care / Food Standards Agency (GOV.UK) · Nov 8, 2016 · Regulator

    “Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”

    assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

  6. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

    BMJ · Feb 28, 2024 · Peer-reviewed

    “Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”

    doi.org