Sweetened beverages
Monster Energy Ultra Watermelon
16 fl oz
Score
- Dye with an EU warning label
- Contains synthetic dyes
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains sugar alcohols
- Contains caffeine
Why it scores 31
Monster Energy Ultra Watermelon scores 31 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Red 40: In the EU and UK, foods with this color must state that it "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children". Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Erythritol: A 2023 study linked higher blood erythritol to cardiovascular events and found it increased clotting activity; long-term safety studies are warranted. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better energy drinks
-
Sparkling Watermelon Splash Gorgie · 12 fl oz No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 72 out of 100 , 41 points higher -
Monster Energy Zero Ultra Monster · 12 oz No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 62 out of 100 , 31 points higher -
05 Watermelon Energy Drink A Shoc · 16 fl oz/473 mL No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 79 out of 100 , 48 points higher -
Sparkling Watermelon Celsius No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 66 out of 100 , 35 points higher -
ASHOC energy Tropical Punch A Shoc Beverage LLC · 16 fl oz (473 mL) No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 79 out of 100 , 48 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Monster Energy Ultra Watermelon
Ingredients
- Red 40 minus 20 points
- Erythritol minus 7.5 points
- Sucralose minus 7.5 points
- Benzoic acid minus 4 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 4 points
- Natural flavors minus 1.5 points
- Caffeine minus 0.5 points
- Sorbic acid minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
Nutrition per 100 ml
- Energy 2 kcal / 100 ml minus 1 points
100 − 69 = 31
Can’t score above 79. Contains Red 40, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][5][6]
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Energy | 2 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g |
Serving: 1.0 can (100.0 g)
Ingredients
- CARBONATED WATER
- CITRIC ACID
- ERYTHRITOL (moderate concern)
- TAURINE
- NATURAL FLAVORS
- SODIUM CITRATE
- PANAX GINSENG FLAVOR
- L-CARNITINE L-TARTRATE
- CAFFEINE
- SORBIC ACID (PRESERVATIVE)
- SUCRALOSE (moderate concern)
- BENZOIC ACID (PRESERVATIVE) (moderate concern)
- VEGETABLE JUICE COLOR
- NIACINAMIDE (VIT. B3)
- ACESULFAME POTASSIUM (moderate concern)
- D-CALCIUM PANTOTHENATE (VIT. B5)
- INOSITOL
- PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE (VIT. B6)
- RED 40 (high concern)
- CYANOCOBALAMIN (VIT. B12)
Label text, as published
CARBONATED WATER, CITRIC ACID, ERYTHRITOL, TAURINE, NATURAL FLAVORS, SODIUM CITRATE, PANAX GINSENG FLAVOR, L-CARNITINE L-TARTRATE, CAFFEINE, SORBIC ACID (PRESERVATIVE), SUCRALOSE, BENZOIC ACID (PRESERVATIVE), VEGETABLE JUICE COLOR, NIACINAMIDE (VIT. B3), ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, D-CALCIUM PANTOTHENATE (VIT. B5), INOSITOL, PYRIDOXINE HYDROCHLORIDE (VIT. B6), RED 40, CYANOCOBALAMIN (VIT. B12)
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of 16 December 2008 on food additives
“may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
“may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”
legislation.gov.uk
-
“Artificial colours or a sodium benzoate preservative (or both) in the diet result in increased hyperactivity in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the general population.”
doi.org
-
Tracking Food Industry Pledges to Remove Petroleum Based Food Dyes
“FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Yellow No. 6, FD&C Blue No. 1, and FD&C Blue No. 2—by the end of 2027.”
fda.gov
-
California AB 2316 (2024), Pupil nutrition: substances: prohibition
“beginning December 31, 2027, would prohibit a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school”
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
-
List of Select Chemicals in the Food Supply Under FDA Review
“The table below includes select food ingredients (including food and color additives), food contact substances, and contaminants under FDA review as of May 12, 2026 .”
fda.gov
-
The artificial sweetener erythritol and cardiovascular event risk
“Our findings reveal that erythritol is both associated with incident MACE risk and fosters enhanced thrombosis. Studies assessing the long-term safety of erythritol are warranted.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of erythritol (E 968) as a food additive (plain language summary)
“In all groups of people, both acute and chronic exposure to erythritol is above the newly set ADI.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance
“As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”
doi.org
-
“Sucralose-6-acetate significantly increased the expression of genes associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer”
doi.org
-
“EFSA’s experts concluded that the sweetener sucralose (E 955) continues to be safe for consumers for its currently authorised uses as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much?
“For most adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams* a day — that's about two to three 12-fluid-ounce cups of coffee — as an amount not generally associated with negative effects.”
fda.gov
-
Caffeine (EFSA topic page; Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine, 2015)
“Caffeine intakes from all sources up to 200mg per day consumed throughout the day do not raise safety concerns for the foetus.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
HHS, FDA to Phase Out Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes in Nation’s Food Supply (press release)
“Initiating the process to revoke authorization for two synthetic food colorings—Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B—within the coming months.”
fda.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.4 (foods with more than 10 % added polyols)
“‘excessive consumption may produce laxative effects’.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 4.1 (beverages with high caffeine content)
“‘High caffeine content. Not recommended for children or pregnant or breast-feeding women’”
eur-lex.europa.eu