Yogurts
Oikos Pro Peach
5.3 oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- No synthetic dyes
Why it scores 71
Oikos Pro Peach scores 71 out of 100 (Good) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 4.5 points 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers: Industrial additive classes found: color (added), flavoring, industrial protein and non-nutritive sweetener. Emerging
- minus 2.5 points Whey protein concentrate / isolate: An ingredient typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). Info
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better yogurt
-
Greek Yogurt Plain Unsweetened Maple Hill · 16 oz/453 g Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 29 points higher -
Total 0% Milkfat Fage · 32 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 29 points higher -
Greek Yogurt Nonfat Plain Chobani · 32 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 29 points higher -
Organic Greek Plain Nonfat Stonyfield Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 29 points higher -
simple ingredient skyr PLAIN Siggi's · 5.3 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 29 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Oikos Pro Peach
Ingredients
- Whey protein concentrate / isolate minus 2.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 2.5 points
- Stevia (steviol glycosides) minus 2.5 points
- Potassium sorbate minus 1.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Protein 13.3 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 29.5 = 70.5 → 71
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 87 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 13.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g |
Serving: 1 Container (150 g)
Ingredients
- cultured grade a ultra-filtered non fat milk
- water
- whey protein concentrate
- natural flavors
- cream
- tapioca starch
- fruit
- vegetable juice concentrate (for color)
- lemon juice concentrate
- stevia leaf reb m
- potassium sorbate (to maintain freshness)
- vitamin d3
- yogurt cultures l. thermophilus
- l. bulgaricus
Label text, as published
cultured grade a ultra-filtered non fat milk, water, whey protein concentrate, natural flavors, cream, contains less than 1% of: tapioca starch, fruit , vegetable juice concentrate (for color), lemon juice concentrate, stevia leaf reb m, potassium sorbate (to maintain freshness), vitamin d3, yogurt cultures l. thermophilus , l. bulgaricus
Allergens and diets
Contains: Milk
- Not vegan
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
21 CFR 182.3640 Potassium sorbate
ecfr.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org