Iced teas
Lipton Lemonade Iced Tea
16 fl oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in sugar
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains added sugars
- Contains caffeine
Why it scores 21
Lipton Lemonade Iced Tea scores 21 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 14 points Sugars 23 g / 100 ml: Very high in sugar. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better bottled tea
-
Unsweetened black iced tea drink Coca-Cola Company · 52.0 fl oz Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 100 out of 100 , 79 points higher -
Zero calorie raspberry iced green tea Steaz · 16 fl oz/473 mL Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 67 out of 100 , 46 points higher -
Iced Tea With Peach Flavor Arizona · 680 mL Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 61 out of 100 , 40 points higher -
Unsweetened iced tea Pure Leaf · 59 fl oz/1.84 Quart/1.74 L Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 100 out of 100 , 79 points higher -
waterdrop Iced Tea: Blueberry Waterdrop · 12 × 2 g Less sugar · No added sugars Score 68 out of 100 , 47 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Lemonade Iced Tea
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Sucralose minus 7.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 1.5 points
- Sodium hexametaphosphate minus 1.5 points
- Phosphoric acid minus 1.5 points
- Potassium sorbate minus 0.5 points
- Gum arabic (acacia) minus 0.5 points
- Glycerol ester of rosin (ester gum) minus 0.5 points
- Calcium disodium EDTA minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 5 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 6 points
Nutrition per 100 ml
- Sugars 23 g / 100 ml minus 14 points
100 − 79.5 = 20.5 → 21
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [15]
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Carbohydrates | 24 g |
|---|---|
| Sugars | 23 g |
Serving: 1 can
Ingredients
- water
- sugar (high concern)
- citric acid
- clarified lemon juice concentrate
- natural flavor
- sodium polyphosphates
- black tea
- phosphoric acid
- potassium sorbate
- acesulfame potassium (moderate concern)
- gum arabic
- glycerol ester of rosin
- calcium disodium EDTA
- sucralose (moderate concern)
Label text, as published
water, sugar, citric acid, clarified lemon juice concentrate, natural flavor, sodium polyphosphates, black tea, phosphoric acid, potassium sorbate, acesulfame potassium, gum arabic, glycerol ester of rosin, calcium disodium EDTA, sucralose.
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance
“As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”
doi.org
-
“Sucralose-6-acetate significantly increased the expression of genes associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer”
doi.org
-
“EFSA’s experts concluded that the sweetener sucralose (E 955) continues to be safe for consumers for its currently authorised uses as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
EFSA issues new advice on phosphates
“We estimated that dietary exposure to phosphates may exceed the new ADI for infants, toddlers and children with average consumption of phosphates in their diet.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
21 CFR 182.3640 Potassium sorbate
ecfr.gov
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much?
“For most adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams* a day — that's about two to three 12-fluid-ounce cups of coffee — as an amount not generally associated with negative effects.”
fda.gov
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 4.1 (beverages with high caffeine content)
“‘High caffeine content. Not recommended for children or pregnant or breast-feeding women’”
eur-lex.europa.eu