Frozen desserts
Popsicle Orange Cherry Grape
29.7 oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains added sugars
- Contains artificial flavors
- No synthetic dyes
Why it scores 25
Popsicle Orange Cherry Grape scores 25 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Aspartame: Labels must warn people with phenylketonuria (PKU) because aspartame contains phenylalanine (US and EU). Regulatory
- minus 20 points Fruit juice concentrate (sweetener): An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better ice cream bars and frozen treats
-
Avengers Cherry & Grape Variety Pops Chloe's Soft Serve Fruit Co. Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 72 out of 100 , 47 points higher -
Grape, cherry crushed fruit pops Solero · 1.5 fl oz No added sugars · No artificial flavors Score 62 out of 100 , 37 points higher -
Spiderman Lemon-Lime & Orange Variety Pops Chloe's Soft Serve Fruit Co. · 1.5 fl oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 72 out of 100 , 47 points higher -
REIGN Total Body Fuel Orange Dreamsicle Reign · 16 fl oz No added sugars · No artificial flavors Score 59 out of 100 , 34 points higher -
Orange Creamsicle Zevia No added sugars · No artificial flavors Score 76 out of 100 , 51 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Orange Cherry Grape
Ingredients
- Aspartame minus 20 points
- Fruit juice concentrate (sweetener) minus 20 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Glycerin minus 1.5 points
- Maltodextrin minus 1 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 6 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 7.5 points
100 − 75.5 = 24.5 → 25
Can’t score above 79. Contains aspartame, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 32 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 7.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g |
Serving: 3 pops (140 g)
Ingredients
- WATER
- GLYCERIN
- MALTODEXTRIN (CORN)
- CITRIC ACID
- BEET JUICE (FOR COLOR)
- GUAR GUM
- NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS
- ASPARTAME (high concern)
- ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C)
- ACESULFAME POTASSIUM (moderate concern)
- GRAPE JUICE CONCENTRATE (high concern)
- LOCUST BEAN GUM
Label text, as published
WATER, GLYCERIN, MALTODEXTRIN (CORN), LESS THAN 2% OF: CITRIC ACID, BEET JUICE (FOR COLOR), GUAR GUM, NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS, ASPARTAME, ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C), ACESULFAME POTASSIUM*, GRAPE JUICE CONCENTRATE, LOCUST BEAN GUM, *PHENYLKETONURICS: CONTAINS PHENYLALANINE
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.3 (aspartame)
“‘contains a source of phenylalanine’ shall appear on the label in cases where aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt is designated in the list of ingredients by its specific name.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Aspartame hazard and risk assessment results released (IARC, WHO and FAO joint news release)
“Citing “limited evidence” for carcinogenicity in humans, IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 2B) and JECFA reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg body weight.”
who.int
-
Aspartame and Other Sweeteners in Food
“The FDA disagrees with IARC’s conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans.”
fda.gov
-
“Aspartame and its breakdown products are safe for human consumption at current levels of exposure”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org