Snacks
Mission CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS Picante
4 oz
Score
- Dye with an EU warning label
- Contains synthetic dyes
- Ultra-processed
- High in salt
- High in saturated fat
- Contains added sugars
Why it scores 11
Mission CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS Picante scores 11 out of 100 (Bad) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Dextrose: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 20 points Yellow 6: In the EU and UK, foods with this color must state that it "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children". Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better pork rinds
-
Chicharrones Mac's · 8.5 oz/240.9 g No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 75 out of 100 , 64 points higher -
Pork Rinds Chicharrones Kroger · 14 g No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 75 out of 100 , 64 points higher -
Pork Rinds (Chicharrones) Lowrey's No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 55 out of 100 , 44 points higher -
Chicharrones pork skins Mac's · 5 oz/141.7 g No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 75 out of 100 , 64 points higher -
White Cheddar Flavored Chicharrones Fried Pork Rinds, White Cheddar Pork King Good · 7 oz/198.5 g No EU warning-label dyes · No synthetic dyes Score 76 out of 100 , 65 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
CHICHARRONES PORK RINDS Picante
Ingredients
- Dextrose minus 20 points
- Yellow 6 minus 20 points
- Caramel color minus 10 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Saturated fat 10.7 g / 100 g minus 9 points
- Salt 6.6 g / 100 g minus 9 points
- Energy 571 kcal / 100 g minus 3 points
- Protein 57.1 g / 100 g plus 4 points
100 − 89.5 = 10.5 → 11
Can’t score above 79. Contains dextrose, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][16]
Can’t score above 79. High in fat, saturated fat and salt (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [17]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 571 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 32.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 57.1 g |
| Salt | 6.6 g |
Serving: 1 serving (14.175 g)
Ingredients
- PORK RINDS
- SALT
- DEXTROSE (high concern)
- SPICES INCLUDING CHILI PEPPERS
- TORULA YEAST
- MALTODEXTRIN
- PAPRIKA
- MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE
- ONION POWDER
- GARLIC POWDER
- EXTRACTIVES OF PAPRIKA
- YELLOW #6 LAKE (high concern)
- NATURAL FLAVOR
- CARAMEL COLOR (high concern)
- RED 40 LAKE (high concern)
Label text, as published
PORK RINDS, SALT, DEXTROSE, SPICES INCLUDING CHILI PEPPERS, TORULA YEAST, MALTODEXTRIN, PAPRIKA, MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE, ONION POWDER, GARLIC POWDER, EXTRACTIVES OF PAPRIKA, YELLOW #6 LAKE, NATURAL FLAVOR, CARAMEL COLOR, RED 40 LAKE
Allergens and diets
- Not vegan
- Not vegetarian
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of 16 December 2008 on food additives
“may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
“may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children.”
legislation.gov.uk
-
“Artificial colours or a sodium benzoate preservative (or both) in the diet result in increased hyperactivity in 3-year-old and 8/9-year-old children in the general population.”
doi.org
-
Tracking Food Industry Pledges to Remove Petroleum Based Food Dyes
“FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Yellow No. 6, FD&C Blue No. 1, and FD&C Blue No. 2—by the end of 2027.”
fda.gov
-
California AB 2316 (2024), Pupil nutrition: substances: prohibition
“beginning December 31, 2027, would prohibit a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school”
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
-
Questions & Answers About 4-MEI
“Based on current science, the FDA has no reason to believe that there are any immediate or short-term health risks presented by 4-MEI at the levels expected in food.”
fda.gov
-
Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–142 (List of Classifications)
monographs.iarc.who.int
-
Proposition 65 List of Chemicals Known to the State to Cause Cancer or Reproductive Toxicity
“The date refers to the initial appearance of the chemical on the list.”
oehha.ca.gov
-
Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline
“WHO recommends that adults and children reduce saturated fatty acid intake to 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).”
who.int
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
List of Select Chemicals in the Food Supply Under FDA Review
“The table below includes select food ingredients (including food and color additives), food contact substances, and contaminants under FDA review as of May 12, 2026 .”
fda.gov
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
HHS, FDA to Phase Out Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes in Nation’s Food Supply (press release)
“Initiating the process to revoke authorization for two synthetic food colorings—Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B—within the coming months.”
fda.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org