Breads
Sunbeam Enriched Bread
24 oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains added sugars
- Contains emulsifiers studied for gut effects
- Contains seed oils
Why it scores 42
Sunbeam Enriched Bread scores 42 out of 100 (Okay) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points High fructose corn syrup: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 4.5 points 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers: Industrial additive classes found: emulsifier, flavoring, industrial protein and industrial sugar or starch hydrolysate. Emerging
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better sliced bread
-
White Enriched Bread Kroger Not ultra-processed · No gut-studied emulsifiers Score 72 out of 100 , 30 points higher -
Ancient grain enriched bread Meijer · 12 oz Not ultra-processed · No high fructose corn syrup Score 68 out of 100 , 26 points higher -
Enriched king white bread Food Club · 20 oz Not ultra-processed · No high fructose corn syrup Score 66 out of 100 , 24 points higher -
Enriched white bread CUB · 20 oz Not ultra-processed · No soy lecithin Score 66 out of 100 , 24 points higher -
Sandwich Round Sourdough Bread Seattle Sourdough · 24 oz Not ultra-processed · No added sugars Score 85 out of 100 , 43 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Enriched Bread
Ingredients
- High fructose corn syrup minus 20 points
- Soybean oil minus 2.5 points
- Wheat gluten minus 2.5 points
- Mono- and diglycerides minus 1.5 points
- Calcium propionate minus 1.5 points
- Sodium stearoyl lactylate minus 1.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 0.5 points
- Soy lecithin minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 7 g / 100 g minus 3 points
- Salt 1.1 g / 100 g minus 3 points
- Energy 281 kcal / 100 g minus 1 points
- Protein 8.8 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 58 = 42
Can’t score above 79. Contains high fructose corn syrup, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 281 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 52.6 g |
| Sugars | 7 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 8.8 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g |
Serving: 1 slice (28 g)
Ingredients
- ENRICHED UNBLEACHED FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, MALTED BARLEY FLOUR, FERROUS SULFATE (IRON), THIAMINE MONONITRATE (VITAMIN B1), RIBOFLAVIN (VITAMIN B2), NIACIN (VITAMIN B3), FOLIC ACID)
- WATER
- HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP (high concern)
- YEAST
- SOYBEAN OIL
- SALT
- SWEET DAIRY WHEY
- WHEAT PROTEIN ISOLATE
- SOY FLOUR
- WHEAT GLUTEN
- MONOGLYCERIDES
- CALCIUM PROPIONATE (A PRESERVATIVE)
- SODIUM STEAROYL LACTYLATE
- VINEGAR
- LACTIC ACID
- NATURAL FLAVORS
- CALCIUM SULFATE
- CITRIC ACID
- ASCORBIC ACID
- SOY LECITHIN
Label text, as published
ENRICHED UNBLEACHED FLOUR [WHEAT FLOUR, MALTED BARLEY FLOUR, FERROUS SULFATE (IRON), THIAMINE MONONITRATE (VITAMIN B1), RIBOFLAVIN (VITAMIN B2), NIACIN (VITAMIN B3), FOLIC ACID], WATER, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, YEAST, SOYBEAN OIL, SALT, SWEET DAIRY WHEY, WHEAT PROTEIN ISOLATE, SOY FLOUR, WHEAT GLUTEN, MONOGLYCERIDES, CALCIUM PROPIONATE (A PRESERVATIVE), SODIUM STEAROYL LACTYLATE, VINEGAR, LACTIC ACID, NATURAL FLAVORS, CALCIUM SULFATE, CITRIC ACID, ASCORBIC ACID, SOY LECITHIN.
Allergens and diets
Contains: Milk, Soy, Wheat, Gluten
- Not vegan
- Not gluten-free
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 184.1866 High fructose corn syrup
“a sweet, nutritive saccharide mixture containing either approximately 42 or 55 percent fructose”
ecfr.gov
-
“replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes.”
doi.org
-
“These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.”
doi.org
-
“This study found positive associations between risk of CVD and intake of five individual and two groups of food additive emulsifiers widely used in industrial foods.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of mono- and di-glycerides of fatty acids (E 471) as food additives
“The available studies did not raise any concern with regard to genotoxicity.”
doi.org
-
11. List of Permitted Preservatives (Lists of Permitted Food Additives)
“B.2 Butylated Hydroxyanisole n/a (a) Active dry yeasts (a) Preservative (a) 1,000 ppm n/a”
canada.ca
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome
“carboxymethylcellulose and polysorbate-80, induced low-grade inflammation and obesity/metabolic syndrome in wild-type hosts and promoted robust colitis in mice predisposed to this disorder.”
doi.org
-
“Relative to control subjects, CMC consumption modestly increased postprandial abdominal discomfort and perturbed gut microbiota composition in a way that reduced its diversity.”
doi.org