Sodas
Fresca Sparkling Soda Water Peach Citrus Original
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
Why it scores 35
Fresca Sparkling Soda Water Peach Citrus Original scores 35 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Aspartame: Labels must warn people with phenylketonuria (PKU) because aspartame contains phenylalanine (US and EU). Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K): In the NutriNet-Santé cohort, acesulfame-K intake was associated with higher cancer risk; cause and effect is not established. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better sparkling water
-
Sparkling Water Peach Naturally Flavored with other Natural Flavors Waterloo · 12 fl oz (355 mL) No non-nutritive sweeteners · No aspartame Score 83 out of 100 , 48 points higher -
Naturally Essenced Peach Pear Sparkling Water La Croix · 355 mL No non-nutritive sweeteners · No aspartame Score 83 out of 100 , 48 points higher -
Club soda Great Value · 33.8 fl oz/1 L Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 92 out of 100 , 57 points higher -
Club Soda Canada Dry · 10 oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 65 points higher -
Forever Peach Maison Perrier No non-nutritive sweeteners · No aspartame Score 80 out of 100 , 45 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Sparkling Soda Water Peach Citrus Original
Ingredients
- Aspartame minus 20 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Potassium benzoate minus 7.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 1.5 points
- Potassium sorbate minus 1.5 points
- Gum arabic (acacia) minus 1.5 points
- Glycerol ester of rosin (ester gum) minus 0.5 points
- Calcium disodium EDTA minus 0.5 points
- Locust bean gum minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 5 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 6 points
100 − 65 = 35
Can’t score above 79. Contains aspartame, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Energy | 0 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
Ingredients
- CARBONATED WATER
- CITRIC ACID
- NATURAL FLAVORS
- POTASSIUM CITRATE
- CONCENTRATED GRAPEFRUIT JUICE
- ASPARTAME (high concern)
- POTASSIUM SORBATE (TO PROTECT TASTE)
- ACESULFAME POTASSIUM (moderate concern)
- ACACIA GUM
- POTASSIUM BENZOATE (TO PROTECT TASTE) (moderate concern)
- GLYCEROL ESTER OF ROSIN
- CALCIUM DISODIUM EDTA (TO PROTECT TASTE)
- CAROB BEAN GUM
Label text, as published
CARBONATED WATER, CITRIC ACID, NATURAL FLAVORS, POTASSIUM CITRATE, CONCENTRATED GRAPEFRUIT JUICE, ASPARTAME, POTASSIUM SORBATE (TO PROTECT TASTE), ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, ACACIA GUM, POTASSIUM BENZOATE (TO PROTECT TASTE), GLYCEROL ESTER OF ROSIN, CALCIUM DISODIUM EDTA (TO PROTECT TASTE), CAROB BEAN GUM
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.3 (aspartame)
“‘contains a source of phenylalanine’ shall appear on the label in cases where aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt is designated in the list of ingredients by its specific name.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Aspartame hazard and risk assessment results released (IARC, WHO and FAO joint news release)
“Citing “limited evidence” for carcinogenicity in humans, IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 2B) and JECFA reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg body weight.”
who.int
-
Aspartame and Other Sweeteners in Food
“The FDA disagrees with IARC’s conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans.”
fda.gov
-
“Aspartame and its breakdown products are safe for human consumption at current levels of exposure”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
21 CFR 182.3640 Potassium sorbate
ecfr.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org