Instant noodles
Samyang Buldak HOT Chicken Flavor Ramen
5 × 140 g
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in salt
- High in saturated fat
- Contains added sugars
- Contains seed oils
- Contains palm oil
Why it scores 28
Samyang Buldak HOT Chicken Flavor Ramen scores 28 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 9 points Salt 2.5 g / 100 g: Very high in salt. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better instant noodles and ramen
-
Jade Pearl Rice Ramen Lotus Foods · 80 g Not ultra-processed · Less saturated fat Score 79 out of 100 , 51 points higher -
Millet & Brown Rice Ramen Noodles Lotus Foods Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 100 out of 100 , 72 points higher -
organic RAMEN NOODLES Ocean's Halo · 10.75 oz Not ultra-processed · Less saturated fat Score 79 out of 100 , 51 points higher -
Japanese Style Ramen Noodles Simply Asia · 8 oz Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 89 out of 100 , 61 points higher -
Ramen Noodle Soup Tapatio · 105 g No added sugars · No seed oils Score 68 out of 100 , 40 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Buldak HOT Chicken Flavor Ramen
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Palm oil minus 2.5 points
- Wheat gluten minus 2.5 points
- Soybean oil minus 1.5 points
- Sodium phosphate minus 1.5 points
- Sodium hexametaphosphate minus 1.5 points
- Guar gum minus 0.5 points
- Lecithin minus 0.5 points
- Yeast extract minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 5 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 6 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 5 g / 100 g minus 3 points
- Saturated fat 5.7 g / 100 g minus 5 points
- Salt 2.5 g / 100 g minus 9 points
- Energy 393 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
- Protein 9.3 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 72 = 28
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in saturated fat and salt (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [14]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 393 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 12.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.7 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 60.7 g |
| Sugars | 5 g |
| Added sugars | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g |
Serving: 1 portion (140 g)
Ingredients
- noodle(76,7%): wheat flour(52%)
- tapioca starch(12%)
- palm oil(11%)
- wheat gluten
- salt
- soybean oil
- water
- acidity regulator (potassium carbonate(e501), sodium carbonate(e500), sodium phosphate dibasic(e339), sodium polyphosphate(e452), citric acid(e330)) (not recognized)
- thickener (guar gum(e412)) (not recognized)
- emulsifier (lecithin(e322)) (not recognized)
- colour (riboflavin(e101)) (not recognized)
- soup(22,7%): water
- artificial chicken flavor powder
- white sugar (high concern)
- soy sauce
- red pepper powder
- soybean oil
- onion powder
- chilli extract
- salt
- garlic powder
- tapioca starch
- yeast extract powder
- black pepper powder
- curry powder
- flake(0,6%): roast sesame
- roasted laver (not recognized)
Label text, as published
noodle(76,7%): wheat flour(52%), tapioca starch(12%), palm oil(11%), wheat gluten, salt, soybean oil, water, acidity regulator[potassium carbonate(e501), sodium carbonate(e500), sodium phosphate dibasic(e339), sodium polyphosphate(e452), citric acid(e330)], thickener [guar gum(e412)], emulsifier[lecithin(e322)], colour[riboflavin(e101)], soup(22,7%): water, artificial chicken flavor powder, white sugar, soy sauce, red pepper powder, soybean oil , onion powder, chilli extract, salt, garlic powder, tapioca starch, yeast extract powder, black pepper powder, curry powder, flake(0,6%): roast sesame, roasted laver
Allergens and diets
Contains: Soy, Wheat, Gluten, Sesame
May contain: Milk, Egg, Fish
- Not gluten-free
- Not palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Packaging
O 7 other plastics
Context only: no points in v1.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline
“WHO recommends that adults and children reduce saturated fatty acid intake to 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).”
who.int
-
Process contaminants in vegetable oils and foods
“The highest levels of GE, as well as 3-MCPD and 2-MCPD (including esters) were found in palm oils and palm fats, followed by other oils and fats.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“Glycidyl fatty acid esters, expressed as glycidol”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
“replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes.”
doi.org
-
“These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.”
doi.org
-
EFSA issues new advice on phosphates
“We estimated that dietary exposure to phosphates may exceed the new ADI for infants, toddlers and children with average consumption of phosphates in their diet.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org