Joyride Gummy Cluster's
Photo: Open Food Facts contributors (CC BY-SA)

Candies

Joyride Gummy Cluster's

Score

Poor 23 out of 100 High confidence
  • Ultra-processed
  • High in sugar
  • Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
  • Contains added sugars

Why it scores 23

Joyride Gummy Cluster's scores 23 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:

  1. minus 20 points Dextrose: An added sugar. Strong
  2. minus 20 points Corn syrup: An added sugar. Strong
  3. minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong

Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.

Better gummy and chewy candy

The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.

The Receipt

Gummy Cluster's

START100

Ingredients

  • Dextrose minus 20 points
    Strong An added sugar. [1][2][3]
  • Corn syrup minus 20 points
    Strong An added sugar. [1][2][3]
  • Soluble corn fiber (resistant dextrin) minus 2.5 points
    Info An additive class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [4]
  • Allulose minus 1.5 points
    Info An ingredient class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [4]
  • Stevia (steviol glycosides) minus 1.5 points
    Emerging WHO (2023) recommends against using non-sugar sweeteners to control body weight (conditional recommendation); US dietary guidelines advise limiting them. [5][2]
subtotal−45.5

Processing

  • Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
    Strong Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. [4]
  • 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
    Emerging Industrial additive classes found: bulking agent, industrial sugar or starch hydrolysate and non-nutritive sweetener. [4]
subtotal−21

Nutrition per 100 g

  • Sugars 33.3 g / 100 g minus 14 points
    Strong Very high in sugar. [1]
  • Energy 233 kcal / 100 g minus 1 points
    Info Energy-dense for its weight. [2]
  • Fiber 26.7 g / 100 g plus 4 points
    Strong A good source of fiber. [2]
subtotal−11

TOTAL 23Poor

100 − 77.5 = 22.5 → 23

Can’t score above 79. Contains dextrose, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]

Can’t score above 79. High in sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [6]


GTIN 00844911008911 · 2026-08-14

score v1.3.0 · kb 2026.10.11

High confidence

Same product, same score. Every time.

Nutrition per 100 g

Energy233 kcal
Fat0 g
Saturated fat0 g
Trans fat0 g
Carbohydrates86.7 g
Sugars33.3 g
Added sugars33.3 g
Fiber26.7 g
Protein0 g
Salt0 g

Serving: 10 pleces (30 g)

Ingredients

High Moderate Not recognized Tap an ingredient for its evidence and rules.
Label text, as published

DEXTROSE, SOLUBLE FIBER, ALLULOSE, CORN STARCH-MO, GLUCOSE SYRUP, LACTIC ACID, CAL LACTATE, CITRIC ACID, NATURAL FLA COLORS FROM FRUIT AND VEGETABLI EXTRACTS (CARROT, BLACKCURRANT BLUEBERRY, PEPPER), SPIRULINA AND TURMERIC (FOR COLOR), CONFECTION GLAZE, STEVIOL GLYCOSIDES

Allergens and diets

  • Palm-oil-free

Always check the package: recipes change.

Sources

  1. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children

    World Health Organization · Mar 4, 2015 · Agency assessment

    “In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”

    who.int

  2. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture · January 2026 · Regulator

    “Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”

    cdn.realfood.gov

  3. Added and free sugars should be as low as possible

    European Food Safety Authority · Feb 28, 2022 · Agency assessment

    “Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”

    efsa.europa.eu

  4. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them

    Public Health Nutrition · April 2019 · Peer-reviewed

    doi.org

  5. WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline

    World Health Organization · May 15, 2023 · Agency assessment

    “The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”

    who.int

  6. Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets

    Department of Health and Social Care / Food Standards Agency (GOV.UK) · Nov 8, 2016 · Regulator

    “Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”

    assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

  7. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

    BMJ · Feb 28, 2024 · Peer-reviewed

    “Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”

    doi.org