Hot sauces
Texas Pete Hot Chile Sauce
18 oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in salt
- Contains added sugars
Why it scores 35
Texas Pete Hot Chile Sauce scores 35 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 9 points Salt 7.1 g / 100 g: Very high in salt. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better hot sauce
-
Hatch Green Chile Hot Zia Hatch Chile Company · 16 oz Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 89 out of 100 , 54 points higher -
Hot Sauce Chile Habanero El Yucateco · 120 mL No added sugars · No sugar Score 63 out of 100 , 28 points higher -
Chile habanero sauce El Yucateco · 4 fl oz/120 mL No added sugars · No sugar Score 63 out of 100 , 28 points higher -
Sriracha Hot Sauce Yellowbird · 9.8 oz/278 g Not ultra-processed · No added sugars Score 78 out of 100 , 43 points higher -
PERi PERi Sauce - Medium Nando's PERi-PERi · 9.2 oz Not ultra-processed · No added sugars Score 78 out of 100 , 43 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Hot Chile Sauce
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Sodium bisulfite minus 7.5 points
- Potassium sorbate minus 2.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 16.7 g / 100 g minus 8 points
- Salt 7.1 g / 100 g minus 9 points
100 − 65 = 35
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in salt (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [11]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 83 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 16.7 g |
| Sugars | 16.7 g |
| Added sugars | 16.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 7.1 g |
Serving: 1 serving (6 g)
Ingredients
- CHILE (PEPPERS, VINEGAR, SALT) (not recognized)
- SUGAR (high concern)
- GARLIC
- POTASSIUM SORBATE (TO PRESERVE FRESHNESS AND FLAVOR)
- SODIUM BISULFITE (TO PRESERVE FRESHNESS) (moderate concern)
Label text, as published
CHILE (PEPPERS, VINEGAR, SALT), SUGAR, GARLIC, POTASSIUM SORBATE (TO PRESERVE FRESHNESS AND FLAVOR), SODIUM BISULFITE (TO PRESERVE FRESHNESS).
Allergens and diets
Contains: Sulphites
- Vegan
- Vegetarian
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers
“ANNEX II SUBSTANCES OR PRODUCTS CAUSING ALLERGIES OR INTOLERANCES 1. Cereals containing gluten, namely: wheat, rye, barley, oats, spelt, kamut or their hybridised strains”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
“1. Cereals containing gluten, namely: wheat (such as spelt and khorasan wheat), rye, barley, oats or their hybridised strains, and products thereof”
legislation.gov.uk
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
21 CFR 182.3640 Potassium sorbate
ecfr.gov
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org