Cookies
Archway Soft Iced Molasses Cookies
33 g
Score
- Not permitted in some countries
- Ultra-processed
- High in sugar
- Contains added sugars
- Contains seed oils
- No synthetic dyes
Why it scores 10
Archway Soft Iced Molasses Cookies scores 10 out of 100 (Bad) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 20 points Molasses: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better cookies
-
Soft & Chewy Coconut Cookies Dark Cacao Emmy's Organics · 6 oz (170 g) No banned ingredients · Not ultra-processed Score 53 out of 100 , 43 points higher -
Iced Duos Cookies + Caramel Donut Shop Coffee No banned ingredients · Less sugar Score 83 out of 100 , 73 points higher -
Snickerdoodle Soft Cookies Partake Foods · 5.5 oz/156 g No banned ingredients · Not ultra-processed Score 37 out of 100 , 27 points higher -
Organic Soft & Chewy Coconut Cookies Vanilla Bean Emmy's Organics · 6 oz No banned ingredients · Not ultra-processed Score 61 out of 100 , 51 points higher -
Super Soft Snickerdoodle Cookies Maxine’s Heavenly · 7.7 oz No banned ingredients · Not ultra-processed Score 55 out of 100 , 45 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Soft Iced Molasses Cookies
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Molasses minus 20 points
- High fructose corn syrup minus 10 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 42.4 g / 100 g minus 14 points
- Salt 1.4 g / 100 g minus 5 points
- Energy 394 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
- Fiber 3 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 90 = 10
Can’t score above 25. Contains titanium dioxide, which is banned in food in the EU. [7]
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]
Can’t score above 79. High in sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [14]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 394 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 6.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 78.8 g |
| Sugars | 42.4 g |
| Added sugars | 42.4 g |
| Fiber | 3 g |
| Protein | 3 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g |
Serving: 3 cookies (33 g)
Ingredients
- ENRICHED BLEACHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID)
- SUGAR (high concern)
- MOLASSES (high concern)
- HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP (high concern)
- CANOLA OIL
- RAISINS
- BAKING SODA
- SALT
- SPICE (CINNAMON)
- EGGS
- MODIFIED SOY PROTEIN
- TITANIUM DIOXIDE (FOR COLOR) (high concern)
- WHEY POWDER (MILK)
Label text, as published
ENRICHED BLEACHED WHEAT FLOUR (WHEAT FLOUR, NIACIN, REDUCED IRON, THIAMINE MONONITRATE, RIBOFLAVIN, FOLIC ACID), SUGAR, MOLASSES, HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP, CANOLA OIL, RAISINS, BAKING SODA, SALT, SPICE (CINNAMON), EGGS, MODIFIED SOY PROTEIN, TITANIUM DIOXIDE (FOR COLOR), WHEY POWDER (MILK).
Allergens and diets
Contains: Milk, Soy, Wheat, Gluten, Egg
- Not vegan
- Vegetarian
- Not gluten-free
- Not palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 184.1866 High fructose corn syrup
“a sweet, nutritive saccharide mixture containing either approximately 42 or 55 percent fructose”
ecfr.gov
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“titanium dioxide (E 171) can no longer be considered safe when used as a food additive.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Titanium dioxide: E171 no longer considered safe when used as a food additive
“the Panel concluded that titanium dioxide can no longer be considered safe as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“Considering the very low oral absorption of INS 171, and in the absence of any identifiable hazard associated with INS 171 in the diet, the Committee reaffirmed the ADI “not specified” established at the Thirteenth meeting.”
who.int
-
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a food additive: Current science report
“In summary, the Food Directorate's position is that there is no conclusive scientific evidence that the food additive TiO2 is a concern for human health.”
canada.ca
-
Statement on the safety of Titanium Dioxide (E171) as a Food Additive (COT/2024/05)
“The Committee concludes that it is unlikely that there would be a risk to health from exposures of E171 TiO2 from the diet in any of the age groups or scenarios assessed.”
cot.food.gov.uk
-
Titanium Dioxide as a Color Additive in Foods
“Other international regulatory bodies including the United Kingdom’s Food Standards Agency (FSA), Health Canada, and Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) have not agreed with EFSA’s assessment.”
fda.gov
-
Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–142 (List of Classifications)
monographs.iarc.who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
Revocation of Authorization for Use of Brominated Vegetable Oil in Food (89 FR 55040)
“This action is being taken because there is no longer a reasonable certainty of no harm from the continued use of BVO in food.”
federalregister.gov
-
“This order is effective January 15, 2027, except for amendatory instruction 4, which is effective January 18, 2028.”
federalregister.gov
-
Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products
“cosmetic products shall not contain any of the following: (a) prohibited substances — prohibited substances listed in Annex II”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
“replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes.”
doi.org
-
“These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.”
doi.org