Sugar-free chewing gum
Extra Spearmint Sugarfree Gum
2.7 g
Score
- Contains synthetic dyes
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains sugar alcohols
Why it scores 32
Extra Spearmint Sugarfree Gum scores 32 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Aspartame: Labels must warn people with phenylketonuria (PKU) because aspartame contains phenylalanine (US and EU). Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 8 points 7 kinds of ultra-processing markers: Industrial additive classes found: color (added), emulsifier, flavoring, glazing agent, humectant, non-nutritive sweetener and sugar alcohol (polyol). Emerging
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better chewing gum
-
Spearmint Gum Pur No synthetic dyes · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 66 out of 100 , 34 points higher -
The PUR Company, Spearmint Three, Sugar Free Gum The PUR Company No synthetic dyes · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 72 out of 100 , 40 points higher -
BreathSavers Spearmint Breath savers No synthetic dyes · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 67 out of 100 , 35 points higher -
Extra pink lemonade slim pack Extra · 15 No synthetic dyes · Not ultra-processed Score 99 out of 100 , 67 points higher -
Spearmint gum Xlear Inc. No synthetic dyes · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 63 out of 100 , 31 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Spearmint Sugarfree Gum
Ingredients
- Aspartame minus 20 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Blue 1 minus 7.5 points
- Sorbitol minus 1.5 points
- Gum base minus 1.5 points
- Glycerin minus 1.5 points
- Maltitol minus 0.5 points
- Mannitol minus 0.5 points
- Soy lecithin minus 0.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 7 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 8 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Energy 200 kcal / 100 g minus 1 points
100 − 68.5 = 31.5 → 32
Can’t score above 79. Contains aspartame, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 200 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 74.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g |
Serving: 2.7g
Ingredients
- Sorbitol
- gum base
- glycerol
- hydrogenated starch hydrolysate
- aspartame (high concern)
- mannitol
- acesulfame k (moderate concern)
- soy lecithin
- bth (not recognized)
- tumeric (not recognized)
- blue 1 lake (moderate concern)
- natural and aritficial flavors
Label text, as published
Sorbitol, gum base, glycerol, hydrogenated starch hydrolysate, aspartame, mannitol, acesulfame k, soy lecithin, bth, tumeric, blue 1 lake, phenylalanine, phenylketonurics, and natural and aritficial flavors
Allergens and diets
Contains: Soy
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.3 (aspartame)
“‘contains a source of phenylalanine’ shall appear on the label in cases where aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt is designated in the list of ingredients by its specific name.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Aspartame hazard and risk assessment results released (IARC, WHO and FAO joint news release)
“Citing “limited evidence” for carcinogenicity in humans, IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 2B) and JECFA reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg body weight.”
who.int
-
Aspartame and Other Sweeteners in Food
“The FDA disagrees with IARC’s conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans.”
fda.gov
-
“Aspartame and its breakdown products are safe for human consumption at current levels of exposure”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Tracking Food Industry Pledges to Remove Petroleum Based Food Dyes
“FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Yellow No. 6, FD&C Blue No. 1, and FD&C Blue No. 2—by the end of 2027.”
fda.gov
-
California AB 2316 (2024), Pupil nutrition: substances: prohibition
“beginning December 31, 2027, would prohibit a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school”
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.4 (foods with more than 10 % added polyols)
“‘excessive consumption may produce laxative effects’.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
HHS, FDA to Phase Out Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes in Nation’s Food Supply (press release)
“Initiating the process to revoke authorization for two synthetic food colorings—Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B—within the coming months.”
fda.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org