Green teas
Lipton Green Tea Zero Sugar
16.9 oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
- Contains caffeine
Why it scores 42
Lipton Green Tea Zero Sugar scores 42 out of 100 (Okay) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Aspartame: Labels must warn people with phenylketonuria (PKU) because aspartame contains phenylalanine (US and EU). Regulatory
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K): In the NutriNet-Santé cohort, acesulfame-K intake was associated with higher cancer risk; cause and effect is not established. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better tea bags and loose tea
-
Green Tea Bigelow · 25 g, 20 bags Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 58 points higher -
Legends of china green tea Uncle Lee's Tea Inc. · 5.64 oz/160 g Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 58 points higher -
Green Tea with Ginger Bigelow · .90 oz/25 g Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 58 points higher -
Green Tea Pure Green Yogi · 16 tea bags net WT 1.09 oz/31 Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 58 points higher -
Bold Green Tea Ito En Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 58 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Green Tea Zero Sugar
Ingredients
- Aspartame minus 20 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Sodium hexametaphosphate minus 2.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 1.5 points
- Potassium sorbate minus 1.5 points
- Phosphoric acid minus 1.5 points
- Pectin minus 0.5 points
- Calcium disodium EDTA minus 0.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 4 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 4.5 points
100 − 58 = 42
Can’t score above 79. Contains aspartame, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 0 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Added sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g |
Serving: 500 ml (1.05 PT), 1 BOTTLE | ()
Ingredients
- WATER
- CITRIC ACID
- SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE (TO PROTECT FLAVOR)
- NATURAL FLAVOR
- GREEN TEA
- ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C)
- POTASSIUM SORBATE (PRESERVES FRESHNESS)
- PHOSPHORIC ACID
- ASPARTAME (high concern)
- ACESULFAME POTASSIUM (moderate concern)
- PECTIN
- CALCIUM DISODIUM EDTA (TO PROTECT FLAVOR)
Label text, as published
WATER, CITRIC ACID, SODIUM HEXAMETAPHOSPHATE (TO PROTECT FLAVOR), NATURAL FLAVOR, GREEN TEA, ASCORBIC ACID (VITAMIN C), POTASSIUM SORBATE (PRESERVES FRESHNESS), PHOSPHORIC ACID, ASPARTAME, ACESULFAME POTASSIUM, PECTIN, CALCIUM DISODIUM EDTA (TO PROTECT FLAVOR).
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Packaging
Pet 1 polyethylene terephthalate
Context only: no points in v1.
Sources
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 2.3 (aspartame)
“‘contains a source of phenylalanine’ shall appear on the label in cases where aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt is designated in the list of ingredients by its specific name.”
eur-lex.europa.eu
-
Aspartame hazard and risk assessment results released (IARC, WHO and FAO joint news release)
“Citing “limited evidence” for carcinogenicity in humans, IARC classified aspartame as possibly carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 2B) and JECFA reaffirmed the acceptable daily intake of 40 mg/kg body weight.”
who.int
-
Aspartame and Other Sweeteners in Food
“The FDA disagrees with IARC’s conclusion that these studies support classifying aspartame as a possible carcinogen to humans.”
fda.gov
-
“Aspartame and its breakdown products are safe for human consumption at current levels of exposure”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
EFSA issues new advice on phosphates
“We estimated that dietary exposure to phosphates may exceed the new ADI for infants, toddlers and children with average consumption of phosphates in their diet.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
“By applying a default uncertainty factor of 100, the Panel established a group ADI expressed as 11 mg sorbic acid/kg bw per day for sorbic acid (E 200) and its potassium salt (E 202).”
doi.org
-
21 CFR 182.3640 Potassium sorbate
ecfr.gov
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much?
“For most adults, the FDA has cited 400 milligrams* a day — that's about two to three 12-fluid-ounce cups of coffee — as an amount not generally associated with negative effects.”
fda.gov
-
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, Annex III point 4.1 (beverages with high caffeine content)
“‘High caffeine content. Not recommended for children or pregnant or breast-feeding women’”
eur-lex.europa.eu