Shortbread cookie with coconut
St Michel Crunchy Coconut 20 Sable's Cookies, Coconut
120 g
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in sugar
- High in salt
- Contains added sugars
- Seed-oil free
Why it scores 33
St Michel Crunchy Coconut 20 Sable's Cookies, Coconut scores 33 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 11 points Sugars 24 g / 100 g: Very high in sugar. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better cookies
-
sablé NATURE Gerblé · 132 g Less sugar · Less salt Score 76 out of 100 , 43 points higher -
Cashew Cookies Toasted Coconut Bites Karma Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 70 out of 100 , 37 points higher -
Coconut cookies vanilla bean Emmy's · 4 oz Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 58 out of 100 , 25 points higher -
Coconut Cookies Dark Cacao Emmy's Organics · 6 oz Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 77 out of 100 , 44 points higher -
Coconut Melts Mango Ba-nilla Once Upon A Farm · 1.0 oz Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 79 out of 100 , 46 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Crunchy Coconut 20 Sable's Cookies, Coconut
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Hydrogenated oil minus 2.5 points
- Lecithin minus 2.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 2 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 1.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 24 g / 100 g minus 11 points
- Saturated fat 4.7 g / 100 g minus 5 points
- Salt 1.9 g / 100 g minus 7 points
- Energy 466 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
- Fiber 4 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 67.5 = 32.5 → 33
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in sugars and salt (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [7]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 466 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.7 g |
| Carbohydrates | 71 g |
| Sugars | 24 g |
| Added sugars | 25.6 g |
| Fiber | 4 g |
| Protein | 7 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g |
Serving: 6 g
Ingredients
- WHEAT FLOUR
- SUGAR (high concern)
- COCONUT 11%
- NON-HYDROGENATED SUNFLOWER OIL
- RAISING AGENTS AMMONIUM AND SODIUM CARBONATES
- CITRIC ACID)
- SALT
- DRIED SKIMMED MILK
- EMULSIFIER: LECITHINS
Label text, as published
COCONUT BISCUITS INGREDIENTS: WHEAT FLOUR, SUGAR, COCONUT 11%, NON-HYDROGENATED SUNFLOWER OIL, RAISING AGENTS AMMONIUM AND SODIUM CARBONATES, CITRIC ACID), SALT, DRIED SKIMMED MILK, EMULSIFIER: LECITHINS.
Allergens and diets
Contains: Milk, Tree nuts, Soy, Wheat, Gluten
May contain: Egg, Sesame
- Not vegan
- Vegetarian
- Not gluten-free
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Packaging
Cardboard, Pp 5 polypropylene
Context only: no points in v1.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline
“WHO recommends that adults and children reduce saturated fatty acid intake to 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).”
who.int
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org