Popcorn
Skinny Pop SkinnyPop Harry Potter
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in sugar
- Contains added sugars
- Contains seed oils
- No synthetic dyes
Why it scores 15
Skinny Pop SkinnyPop Harry Potter scores 15 out of 100 (Bad) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 20 points Brown sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better popcorn
-
Skinnypop Popcorn White Cheddar Skinny Pop · 3.9 oz/108 g Less sugar · No added sugars Score 68 out of 100 , 53 points higher -
Organic Popcorn with Organic Extra Virgin Olive Oil Trader Joe's · 400 g Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 79 out of 100 , 64 points higher -
Sweet & Salty Kettle Corn Angie's Boomchickapop · 3 lb Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 66 out of 100 , 51 points higher -
Piquant Popcorn Trader Joe's · 142 g Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 79 out of 100 , 64 points higher -
Sea Salt Popcorn Simply Nature · 6 oz Not ultra-processed · Less sugar Score 79 out of 100 , 64 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
SkinnyPop Harry Potter
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Brown sugar minus 20 points
- Molasses minus 10 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 2 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 1.5 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 28.6 g / 100 g minus 14 points
- Saturated fat 1.8 g / 100 g minus 1 points
- Energy 500 kcal / 100 g minus 3 points
- Fiber 3.6 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 85.5 = 14.5 → 15
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in fat and sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [6]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 500 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 67.9 g |
| Sugars | 28.6 g |
| Added sugars | 28.6 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g |
Serving: 1 serving (28 g)
Ingredients
- POPCORN
- SUGAR (high concern)
- SUNFLOWER OIL
- BROWN SUGAR (high concern)
- RICE FLOUR SALT
- MOLASSES (high concern)
- CARAMELIZED SUGAR (high concern)
- NATURAL FLAVOR
- GIGER (not recognized)
- CINNAMON
- TURMERIC EXTRACT (COLOR)
Label text, as published
POPCORN, SUGAR, SUNFLOWER OIL, BROWN SUGAR, RICE FLOUR SALT, MOLASSES, CARAMELIZED SUGAR, NATURAL FLAVOR, GIGER, CINNAMON, TURMERIC EXTRACT (COLOR)
Allergens and diets
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline
“WHO recommends that adults and children reduce saturated fatty acid intake to 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).”
who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org
-
“replacement of saturated fat in the diet with linoleic acid effectively lowers serum cholesterol but does not support the hypothesis that this translates to a lower risk of death from coronary heart disease or all causes.”
doi.org
-
“These data provide support for current recommendations to replace saturated fat with polyunsaturated fat for primary prevention of CHD.”
doi.org