Sodas
Goslings Non Alcoholic Diet Ginger Beer
12 fl oz/355 mL
Score
- Ultra-processed
- Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
Why it scores 54
Goslings Non Alcoholic Diet Ginger Beer scores 54 out of 100 (Okay) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Potassium benzoate: Benzoates can form small amounts of benzene in drinks that also contain ascorbic acid (vitamin C), especially with heat or light. Strong
- minus 7.5 points Sucralose: In a 2022 randomized study, sucralose and saccharin altered the gut microbiome and impaired glucose responses in some people; a 2023 lab study raised questions about its by-product sucralose-6-acetate. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better sodas
-
Ginger Root Beer Zevia · 12 fl oz Not ultra-processed · No potassium benzoate Score 95 out of 100 , 41 points higher -
Mineragua Jarritos Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 100 out of 100 , 46 points higher -
GFuel Power Pellet G Fuel · 16 fl oz/1 PT/473 mL Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 95 out of 100 , 41 points higher -
Watermelon mist True North · 12 fl oz Not ultra-processed · No non-nutritive sweeteners Score 95 out of 100 , 41 points higher -
Grape Soda Zevia · 12 fl oz/355 mL Not ultra-processed · No potassium benzoate Score 95 out of 100 , 41 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Non Alcoholic Diet Ginger Beer
Ingredients
- Potassium benzoate minus 7.5 points
- Sucralose minus 7.5 points
- Acesulfame potassium (Ace-K) minus 7.5 points
- Gum arabic (acacia) minus 1.5 points
- Glycerol ester of rosin (ester gum) minus 1.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
100 − 46.5 = 53.5 → 54
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Energy | 0 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g |
Serving: 1 CAN (355 ml)
Ingredients
- Contains carbonated water
- natural ginger beer flavor
- citric acid
- potassium benzoate (a preservative) (moderate concern)
- gum acacia
- sucralose (moderate concern)
- ester gum
- acesulfame potassium (moderate concern)
Label text, as published
Contains carbonated water, natural ginger beer flavor, citric acid, potassium benzoate (a preservative), gum acacia, sucralose, ester gum, acesulfame potassium.
Allergens and diets
- Vegan
- Vegetarian
- Gluten-free
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance
“As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”
doi.org
-
“Sucralose-6-acetate significantly increased the expression of genes associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and cancer”
doi.org
-
“EFSA’s experts concluded that the sweetener sucralose (E 955) continues to be safe for consumers for its currently authorised uses as a food additive.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline
“The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study
“In this large cohort study, artificial sweeteners (especially aspartame and acesulfame-K), which are used in many food and beverage brands worldwide, were associated with increased cancer risk.”
doi.org
-
Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive (plain language summary)
“The acceptable daily intake (ADI) considered safe for all population groups was set at 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org