Snacks
Wonderful Salt & pepper pistachios
14 oz
Score
- Ultra-processed
- High in salt
- High in saturated fat
- Contains added sugars
Why it scores 23
Wonderful Salt & pepper pistachios scores 23 out of 100 (Poor) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:
- minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 20 points Dextrose: An added sugar. Strong
- minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.
Better pistachios
-
Salt and Pepper Pistachios Trader Joe's · 13 oz Less saturated fat · No added sugars Score 66 out of 100 , 43 points higher -
Salt and pepper shelled pistachios Great Value · 11 oz Not ultra-processed · Less saturated fat Score 68 out of 100 , 45 points higher -
Salt & Pepper Pistachios Good & Gather · 7 oz/198 g Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 79 out of 100 , 56 points higher -
roasted CALIFORNIA PISTACHIOS WITH SEA SALT Member's Mark · 48 oz/3 lb/1.36 kg Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 93 out of 100 , 70 points higher -
Pistachios No Salt Paramount Farms · 16 oz Not ultra-processed · Less salt Score 100 out of 100 , 77 points higher
The same kind of product, at least 10 points higher, sold in the US. Never paid placements.
The Receipt
Salt & pepper pistachios
Ingredients
- Sugar minus 20 points
- Dextrose minus 20 points
- Yeast extract minus 2.5 points
- Natural flavors minus 1.5 points
Processing
- Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
- 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
Nutrition per 100 g
- Sugars 7.1 g / 100 g minus 3 points
- Saturated fat 5.4 g / 100 g minus 5 points
- Salt 2.1 g / 100 g minus 7 points
- Energy 571 kcal / 100 g minus 3 points
- Fiber 10.7 g / 100 g plus 4 points
- Protein 21.4 g / 100 g plus 2 points
100 − 77 = 23
Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]
Can’t score above 79. High in fat, saturated fat and salt (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [8]
Nutrition per 100 g
| Energy | 571 kcal |
|---|---|
| Fat | 46.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g |
| Trans fat | 0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 28.6 g |
| Sugars | 7.1 g |
| Added sugars | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 10.7 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g |
Serving: 49 Pistachios, no shells (28 g)
Ingredients
- Pistachios
- salt
- pepper
- sugar (high concern)
- onion powder
- garlic powder
- dextrose (high concern)
- yeast extract
- lemon juice concentrate
- natural flavor
Label text, as published
Pistachios, salt, pepper, sugar, onion powder, garlic powder, dextrose, yeast extract, lemon juice concentrate, natural flavor.
Allergens and diets
Contains: Tree nuts
- Palm-oil-free
Always check the package: recipes change.
Sources
-
Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children
“In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”
who.int
-
Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030
“Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”
cdn.realfood.gov
-
Added and free sugars should be as low as possible
“Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”
efsa.europa.eu
-
21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives
“whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”
ecfr.gov
-
Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children: WHO guideline
“WHO recommends that adults and children reduce saturated fatty acid intake to 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).”
who.int
-
“For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”
who.int
-
“Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
-
“Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”
doi.org