Bare Bones Instant Bone Broth
Photo: Open Food Facts contributors (CC BY-SA)

Dehydrated broths

Bare Bones Instant Bone Broth

15 g

Score

Good 67 out of 100 High confidence
  • Ultra-processed
  • High in salt

Why it scores 67

Bare Bones Instant Bone Broth scores 67 out of 100 (Good) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:

  1. minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
  2. minus 9 points Salt 7.7 g / 100 g: Very high in salt. Strong
  3. plus 4 points Fiber 6.7 g / 100 g: A good source of fiber. Strong

Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.

The Receipt

Instant Bone Broth

START100

Ingredients

  • Inulin (chicory root fiber) minus 2.5 points
    Info An ingredient class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [1]
  • Maltodextrin minus 2.5 points
    Info An additive class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [1]
  • Guar gum minus 2.5 points
    Info An ingredient class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [1]
subtotal−7.5

Processing

  • Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
    Strong Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. [1]
  • 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
    Emerging Industrial additive classes found: bulking agent, industrial sugar or starch hydrolysate and thickener, stabilizer or gelling agent. [1]
subtotal−21

Nutrition per 100 g

  • Salt 7.7 g / 100 g minus 9 points
    Strong Very high in salt. [2]
  • Energy 333 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
    Info Energy-dense for its weight. [3]
  • Fiber 6.7 g / 100 g plus 4 points
    Strong A good source of fiber. [3]
  • Protein 66.7 g / 100 g plus 2 points
    Info A good source of protein. [3]
subtotal−5

TOTAL 67Good

100 − 33.5 = 66.5 → 67

Can’t score above 79. High in salt (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [4]


GTIN 00850005324010 · 2026-10-04

score v1.3.0 · kb 2026.10.11

High confidence

Same product, same score. Every time.

Nutrition per 100 g

Energy333 kcal
Fat0 g
Saturated fat0 g
Trans fat0 g
Carbohydrates20 g
Sugars0 g
Added sugars0 g
Fiber6.7 g
Protein66.7 g
Salt7.7 g

Serving: 1 packet (15 g)

Ingredients

High Moderate Not recognized Tap an ingredient for its evidence and rules.
Label text, as published

GRASS-FED BEEF BONE BROTH POWDER, GRASS-FED BEEF COLLAGEN, BAKER'S YEAST EXTRACT, TOMATO POWDER, SALT, CHICORY ROOT FIBER, APPLE CIDER VINEGAR (ORGANIC TAPIOCA MALTODEXTRIN*, ORGANIC APPLE CIDER VINEGAR), GUAR, GARLIC POWDER, SHIITAKE MUSHROOM POWDER, SPICES.

Allergens and diets

  • Not vegan
  • Not vegetarian
  • Palm-oil-free

Always check the package: recipes change.

Sources

  1. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them

    Public Health Nutrition · April 2019 · Peer-reviewed

    doi.org

  2. Sodium reduction (fact sheet)

    World Health Organization · May 11, 2026 · Agency assessment

    “For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”

    who.int

  3. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture · January 2026 · Regulator

    “Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”

    cdn.realfood.gov

  4. Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets

    Department of Health and Social Care / Food Standards Agency (GOV.UK) · Nov 8, 2016 · Regulator

    “Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”

    assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

  5. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

    BMJ · Feb 28, 2024 · Peer-reviewed

    “Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”

    doi.org