Slurrp Farm NO0DLES 6.4
Photo: Open Food Facts contributors (CC BY-SA)

Food

Slurrp Farm NO0DLES 6.4

192 g

Score

Good 61 out of 100 High confidence
  • Ultra-processed
  • Contains added sugars
  • Contains whole grains

Why it scores 61

Slurrp Farm NO0DLES 6.4 scores 61 out of 100 (Good) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:

  1. minus 20 points Sugar: An added sugar. Strong
  2. minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
  3. plus 4 points Fiber 11.5 g / 100 g: A good source of fiber. Strong

Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.

The Receipt

NO0DLES 6.4

START100

Ingredients

  • Sugar minus 20 points
    Strong An added sugar. [1][2][3]
  • Natural flavors minus 2.5 points
    Info "Natural flavor" is a legal category (21 CFR 101.22(a)(3)): flavor substances from spices, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy or fermentation. [4][5]
subtotal−22.5

Processing

  • Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
    Strong Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. [5]
subtotal−18

Nutrition per 100 g

  • Sugars 6.4 g / 100 g minus 3 points
    Strong Contains some sugar. [1]
  • Energy 365 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
    Info Energy-dense for its weight. [2]
  • Fiber 11.5 g / 100 g plus 4 points
    Strong A good source of fiber. [2]
  • Protein 10 g / 100 g plus 2 points
    Info A good source of protein. [2]
subtotal+1

TOTAL 61Good

100 − 39.5 = 60.5 → 61

Can’t score above 79. Contains sugar, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]


GTIN 08906131681717 · 2025-12-16

score v1.3.0 · kb 2026.10.11

High confidence

Same product, same score. Every time.

Nutrition per 100 g

Energy365 kcal
Fat1.1 g
Saturated fat0.2 g
Trans fat0 g
Carbohydrates78.7 g
Sugars6.4 g
Added sugars0.8 g
Fiber11.5 g
Protein10 g

Ingredients

High Moderate Not recognized Tap an ingredient for its evidence and rules.
Label text, as published

Noodles: Multigrain flour blend (whole wheat (atta), foxtail millet) (91%), cluster bean powder (natural gum), iodised salt, rosemary. Spice Mix (6%): Spice blend (garlic, onion, coriander, chilli, cumin), iodised salt, unrefined raw sugar, milk solids, corn starch, natural and nature-identical flavouring substances, citric acid (acidity regulator) [INS 330].

Allergens and diets

Contains: Milk, Wheat, Gluten

  • Not vegan
  • Not gluten-free
  • Palm-oil-free

Always check the package: recipes change.

Sources

  1. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children

    World Health Organization · Mar 4, 2015 · Agency assessment

    “In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”

    who.int

  2. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture · January 2026 · Regulator

    “Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”

    cdn.realfood.gov

  3. Added and free sugars should be as low as possible

    European Food Safety Authority · Feb 28, 2022 · Agency assessment

    “Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”

    efsa.europa.eu

  4. 21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives

    Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), U.S. Office of the Federal Register · Dec 19, 2016 · Law

    “whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”

    ecfr.gov

  5. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them

    Public Health Nutrition · April 2019 · Peer-reviewed

    doi.org

  6. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

    BMJ · Feb 28, 2024 · Peer-reviewed

    “Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”

    doi.org