RXBAR MINIS Blueberry
Photo: Open Food Facts contributors (CC BY-SA)

Fruits cereal bars

RXBAR MINIS Blueberry

26 g

Score

Good 65 out of 100 High confidence
  • Ultra-processed
  • High in sugar
  • No additives

Why it scores 65

RXBAR MINIS Blueberry scores 65 out of 100 (Good) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:

  1. minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
  2. minus 14 points Sugars 30.8 g / 100 g: Very high in sugar. Strong
  3. plus 4 points Fiber 11.5 g / 100 g: A good source of fiber. Strong

Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.

The Receipt

MINIS Blueberry

START100

Ingredients

  • Natural flavors minus 2.5 points
    Info "Natural flavor" is a legal category (21 CFR 101.22(a)(3)): flavor substances from spices, fruits, vegetables, meat, dairy or fermentation. [1][2]
subtotal−2.5

Processing

  • Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
    Strong Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. [2]
subtotal−18

Nutrition per 100 g

  • Sugars 30.8 g / 100 g minus 14 points
    Strong Very high in sugar. [3]
  • Salt 0.7 g / 100 g minus 3 points
    Strong High in salt. [4]
  • Energy 385 kcal / 100 g minus 2 points
    Info Energy-dense for its weight. [5]
  • Fiber 11.5 g / 100 g plus 4 points
    Strong A good source of fiber. [5]
subtotal−15

TOTAL 65Good

100 − 35.5 = 64.5 → 65

Can’t score above 79. High in sugars (above the front-of-pack "high" level). [6]


GTIN 00193908000446 · 2026-08-11

score v1.3.0 · kb 2026.10.11

High confidence

Same product, same score. Every time.

Nutrition per 100 g

Energy385 kcal
Fat11.5 g
Saturated fat0 g
Trans fat0 g
Carbohydrates46.2 g
Sugars30.8 g
Added sugars0 g
Fiber11.5 g
Protein23.1 g
Salt0.7 g

Serving: 1 bar (26 g)

Ingredients

High Moderate Not recognized Tap an ingredient for its evidence and rules.
Label text, as published

Dates, Egg Whites, Almonds, Cashews, Blueberries, Natural Flavors

Allergens and diets

Contains: Tree nuts, Egg

  • Not vegan
  • Palm-oil-free

Always check the package: recipes change.

Sources

  1. 21 CFR 101.22 Foods; labeling of spices, flavorings, colorings and chemical preservatives

    Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR), U.S. Office of the Federal Register · Dec 19, 2016 · Law

    “whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional.”

    ecfr.gov

  2. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them

    Public Health Nutrition · April 2019 · Peer-reviewed

    doi.org

  3. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children

    World Health Organization · Mar 4, 2015 · Agency assessment

    “In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”

    who.int

  4. Sodium reduction (fact sheet)

    World Health Organization · May 11, 2026 · Agency assessment

    “For adults, WHO recommends less than 2000 mg/day of sodium (equivalent to less than 5 g/day salt), or just under a teaspoon.”

    who.int

  5. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture · January 2026 · Regulator

    “Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”

    cdn.realfood.gov

  6. Guide to creating a front of pack (FoP) nutrition label for pre-packed products sold through retail outlets

    Department of Health and Social Care / Food Standards Agency (GOV.UK) · Nov 8, 2016 · Regulator

    “Table 3: Criteria for drinks (per 100ml)”

    assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

  7. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

    BMJ · Feb 28, 2024 · Peer-reviewed

    “Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”

    doi.org