Cumberland Packing Corp. Zero Calorie Sweetener
Photo: Open Food Facts contributors (CC BY-SA)

Food

Cumberland Packing Corp. Zero Calorie Sweetener

1 g

Score

Okay 54 out of 100 Medium confidence
  • Ultra-processed
  • Contains non-nutritive sweeteners
  • Contains added sugars

Why it scores 54

Cumberland Packing Corp. Zero Calorie Sweetener scores 54 out of 100 (Okay) under GoodSwap’s published rules. What moved the score most:

  1. minus 20 points Dextrose: An added sugar. Strong
  2. minus 18 points Ultra-processed (NOVA 4): Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. Strong
  3. minus 3 points 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers: Industrial additive classes found: anti-caking agent, industrial sugar or starch hydrolysate and non-nutritive sweetener. Emerging

Every line of the math is on The Receipt below, with its evidence tier and sources.

The Receipt

Zero Calorie Sweetener

START100

Ingredients

  • Dextrose minus 20 points
    Strong An added sugar. [1][2][3]
  • Saccharin minus 2.5 points
    Strong EFSA (2024) concluded saccharin is safe and raised its acceptable daily intake to 9 mg/kg body weight; IARC places it in Group 3. [4][5][6][7][2]
  • Calcium silicate minus 2.5 points
    Info An additive class typical of ultra-processed foods (NOVA group 4). [8]
subtotal−25

Processing

  • Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) minus 18 points
    Strong Classified NOVA 4: made with industrial ingredients and additives. [8]
  • 3 kinds of ultra-processing markers minus 3 points
    Emerging Industrial additive classes found: anti-caking agent, industrial sugar or starch hydrolysate and non-nutritive sweetener. [8]
subtotal−21

TOTAL 54Okay

100 − 46 = 54

Can’t score above 79. Contains dextrose, an ingredient of high concern. [1][2][3]


GTIN 00044800001027 · 2026-06-15

score v1.3.0 · kb 2026.10.11

Medium confidence

Same product, same score. Every time.

Nutrition per 100 g

Energy0 kcal
Fat0 g
Carbohydrates100 g
Added sugars100 g
Protein0 g
Salt0 g

Serving: 1g

Ingredients

High Moderate Not recognized Tap an ingredient for its evidence and rules.
Label text, as published

DEXTROSE, SACCHARIN, CREAM OF TARTAR, CALCIUM SILICATE (AN ANTI-CAKING AGENT)

Allergens and diets

  • Vegan
  • Vegetarian
  • Gluten-free
  • Palm-oil-free

Always check the package: recipes change.

Sources

  1. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children

    World Health Organization · Mar 4, 2015 · Agency assessment

    “In both adults and children, WHO recommends reducing the intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake”

    who.int

  2. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture · January 2026 · Regulator

    “Limit foods and beverages that include artificial flavors, petroleum-based dyes, artificial preservatives, and low-calorie non-nutritive sweeteners.”

    cdn.realfood.gov

  3. Added and free sugars should be as low as possible

    European Food Safety Authority · Feb 28, 2022 · Agency assessment

    “Sugar consumption is a known cause of dental caries.”

    efsa.europa.eu

  4. Saccharin: safety threshold increased

    European Food Safety Authority · Nov 15, 2024 · Agency assessment

    “EFSA has concluded that saccharin is safe for human consumption and increased the acceptable daily intake”

    efsa.europa.eu

  5. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, Volumes 1–142 (List of Classifications)

    International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO) · IARC

    monographs.iarc.who.int

  6. Personalized microbiome-driven effects of non-nutritive sweeteners on human glucose tolerance

    Cell · September 2022 · Peer-reviewed

    “As groups, each administered NNS distinctly altered stool and oral microbiome and plasma metabolome, whereas saccharin and sucralose significantly impaired glycemic responses.”

    doi.org

  7. WHO advises not to use non-sugar sweeteners for weight control in newly released guideline

    World Health Organization · May 15, 2023 · Agency assessment

    “The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children.”

    who.int

  8. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them

    Public Health Nutrition · April 2019 · Peer-reviewed

    doi.org

  9. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses

    BMJ · Feb 28, 2024 · Peer-reviewed

    “Greater exposure to ultra-processed food was associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, especially cardiometabolic, common mental disorder, and mortality outcomes.”

    doi.org